An independent guide to everyday eating. We do not diagnose, design diets or recommend medicines, and we are not connected to the former website on this domain. For questions about health, food or weight, see a doctor; in an emergency call 112 or 103 (or your local emergency number).

Research

Research review

Food news appears every day: one product is hailed as a saviour, another branded a threat. Nutrition science moves more slowly and cautiously than the headlines. This section helps you tell solid conclusions from loud phrases.

Nutrition science rarely makes sharp turns. If a headline promises a revolution, it was most likely written by an editor, not a researcher.

— Editor's note

Types of nutrition research

Type of studyWhat it involvesWhat it can show
ObservationalCompares the habits and health of large groups of peopleA link between things, but not necessarily the cause
ExperimentalOne group changes its diet, another doesn't, and the results are comparedThe effect of a specific change under set conditions
Cell or animal studiesProcesses are studied in the laboratoryIdeas for further research, but not advice for people
Review of many studiesResults from different studies are gathered and comparedThe most balanced picture available at the moment

How to read a "scientists have proven" story

  1. Find the original source

    Is there a link to the study itself, or at least to the institution that carried it out? A retelling of a retelling often loses important caveats.

  2. Check who it was tested on

    Cells, animals and people are very different levels of evidence. A finding from a test tube can't be transferred straight to your plate.

  3. Look at the sample size

    In a small group, chance coincidences are easily mistaken for a pattern. The more participants and the longer the follow-up, the more reliable the result.

  4. Tell a link from a cause

    If people who like a certain food are healthier, it doesn't mean the food is the reason: they may differ in lifestyle, income or habits.

  5. Find out who funded it

    A study paid for by a manufacturer isn't necessarily wrong, but its conclusions deserve a closer look and independent confirmation.

  6. Compare with general guidance

    If a story contradicts the WHO's position and your doctor's view, it's better to wait until other researchers have checked the finding.

Myths that often appear in the news

  • "This food burns fat": individual foods don't work that way
  • "Your body needs detox drinks": the body's own organs handle cleansing
  • "Scientists have found the perfect food": there is no single food that suits everyone
  • "Frozen vegetables are useless": freezing preserves many valuable properties well
  • "Natural means healthy": a word on the pack says nothing about the ingredients
  • Sources

    What the guide is based on, why we quote so few figures, and how to check advice about food for yourself.

  • Approaches

    How a varied plate works, how to cook simply with less salt, and how to plan shopping so good food is always within reach.

  • Quick-fix claims (in Russian)

    A note at an archived address: signs of dubious weight-loss promises and where to turn for real help.

  • Glossary

    Words from food packs and nutrition articles in plain English: from free sugars and sodium to fibre and ingredient lists.

Sources

  • World Health Organization: "Healthy diet" fact sheet

This guide draws on the World Health Organization's general advice on healthy eating and on food labelling requirements as they stood when it was written. Recommendations are updated from time to time, and decisions about your own eating are best made together with a doctor.